Diabetes Forums » Forums


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007, 11:52 AM
Dervish Dervish is offline
Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanyatype1 View Post
Hi Panda! That conversion table says that an A1C of 5.5 is "bad"! Am I reading something wrong here? That's crazy!
Read the text below the chart. The page's author considers the ADA's recommendation of staying below 7 to border on criminal negligence (complete with a statement which can be read as an implicit accusation that the ADA is conspiring with doctors to create more business for the medical industry by increasing the rate of complications) and that you should be keeping your A1c below 5 instead.

Then he goes off into a discussion of his belief that, by keeping your average BGL below 83 and never allowing it to go over 100, you can slow/halt aging. This discussion also includes recommendations that everyone, even non-diabetics, should check their BGL several times a day and inject insulin if it goes too high. (I didn't read closely enough to catch whether "too high" meant 83 or 100 in this context.)
Reply With Quote
 
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:00 PM.

For Advertising: