[Dewey]

Originally Posted by rakasis

Don't let anyone scare you into not taking acid. Obviously if your thinking about it your open minded and can make your own decisions.

Sorry, but I fail to see your logic here...I don't see how people who decide against taking LSD makes them any less "open-minded" than anyone who has tried the drug. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.

Originally Posted by rakasis

It baffles me how people can encourage addictive practices like drinking and put you down for experimenting. There is nothing wrong with lsd in low doses. If you need to change the way you feel with drugs on a regular basis , stick to weed and you will stay outta the hospital (until you develop lung cancer).

Once again, am I missing something here? Not sure who encouraged drinking (I know I don't/didn't), but I feel that experimenting with drugs such as LSD can be just as dangerous as drinking...I believe that's why so many people were concerned in their replies. What one person may experience from using LSD, another may not....One may have a good experience, but others may have a "bad trip."

Lastly, I feel that weed is not as strong as LSD and thus, if used in moderation, would not be as harsh (i.e. as to cause Cancer....let's not forget that there are Many additives in regular cigarettes that are NOT in pot). All too often, pot/marijuana gets a bad rap from folks when it's been helpful on a medicinal level. I had a friend who had bone Cancer & had a card on him at all times, stating he was allowed to have x amount of pot on him. He was thin as a rail from the Cancer, but the pot aided his appetite & helped ease the pain that was otherwise unbearable. I think that if pot was used in moderation (& no chemicals were added to it), that it would not be so likely to cause lung cancer.

Just wanted to clarify some thoughts that I had and that others may have shared here.