Diabetes Forums » Forums


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:40 PM
BlueSky's Avatar
BlueSky BlueSky is offline
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd View Post
I beg to differ.

I have been under 60 once in 6 months (56) and my A1c is 4.9.

I have not been over 140 in about 9 months, THAT is how you achieve great control.

-Lloyd
I'm with Loyd on this. The popular notion that having a low HBA1c necessitates lots of hypos sounds logical, but actual experience suggests otherwise. I find the exact opposite to be true. The number of lows increases as HBA1c goes up. This happens because blood glucose becomes more volatile (standard deviation increases) as control deteriorates. The converse is also true. The number of hypos comes down as HBA1c is reduced because control is improving.

The effect of hypos on average blood glucose is also limited. Hypos don't last long because we treat them promptly. On the other hand, highs often last for hours (like when we are asleep).
__________________
In my humble opinion



Type1 since 1977
MDI using Lantus, Novorapid and Actrapid
Reply With Quote
 
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 AM.

For Advertising: