| Hi Rad Warrier!
The muscles used in walking and cycling are pretty much the same. The only difference being that cycling is a low-impact form of exercise.
I'm not big on "stationary bikes" as I like to ride outside whenever possible. A regular bike, properly fit, is great and if you get an indoor trainer (magnetic, air, or fluid resistance --perhaps rollers) you have a machine that you can use indoors, outdoors for recreation or transportation.
The recumbent versus upright issue is more about theology than anything else. I prefer the upright variety because it fits my belief system. Of course fit is a very important factor and, while it seems counter-intuitive on an upright bike, you need to be leaning a bit forward and down so that part of your upper body weight is supported by your arms and a hard (as opposed to a soft) saddle is much more comfortable for long distance rides.
__________________
Be well, do good work, and keep in touch [Garison Keilor]
Ronin (a.k.a, George N. Wells, CPIM)
Tandemist/Lay Theologian
Enjoying Life and Learning about myself everyday.
Pre-D -- Not on Insulin  (yet)
For Cholesterol though:
2500 mg Niacin
10 mg Zocor
2008 cycling miles: 5372 (29 Dec)
2009 Cycling Miles: 4843 (20 Nov)
Fasting C-Peptide 1.4 (02 Oct 08) HbA1c's:
01 July 2008 -- 5.0%
02 Oct 2008 -- 5.4%
01 Apr 2009 -- 5.6%
01 Oct 2009 -- 5.6%
01-Nov 2009 -- 5.4% |