Diabetes Forums » Living with Diabetes » Diabetes » Duration of Diabetes and Retinopathy


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


View Poll Results: Check the category that applies to you
Diabetes for 10-20 years and no retinopathy 22 34.38%
Diabetes for 10-20 years and non-proliferative retinopathy - no laser treatments 8 12.50%
Diabetes for 10-20 years and non-proliferative retinopathy - had/having laser treatments 0 0%
Diabetes for 10-20 years and proliferative retinopathy - no laser treatments 0 0%
Diabetes for 10-20 years and proliferative retinopathy - had/having laser treatments 2 3.13%
Diabetes for 20+ years and no retinopathy 21 32.81%
Diabetes for 20+ years and non-proliferative retinopathy - no laser treatments 4 6.25%
Diabetes for 20 + years and non-proliferative retinopathy - had/having laser treatments 1 1.56%
Diabetes for 20+ years and proliferative retinopathy - no laser treatments 0 0%
Diabetes for 20+ years and proliferative retinopathy - had/having laser treatments 6 9.38%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Duration of Diabetes and Retinopathy LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007, 08:17 PM
xMenace's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 7,119
Cumulative makes more sense. Was the tear in the periphery?
__________________
Michael Pollan on CBC

In Defense of Food with Michael Pollan


T1 1975, MM 722 pump

10/08
A1C 7/08 6.1%
HDL - 1.74 (67)
LDL - 1.89 (73)
Triglicerides - 0.52 (47.0)


7/08
A1C 7/08 5.9%
HDL - 1.55 (59.9)
LDL - 1.76 (68.1)
Triglicerides - 0.44 (40.0)

John
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007, 08:22 PM
BriOnH's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by duck View Post
Brother, don't let the sugar kill you. Work harder on letting the sex, drugs or rock and roll kill you.
Sorry to go off topic, but

AMEN!
__________________
Brian Hartigan
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007, 08:37 PM
Lizzy's Avatar
Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 195
43 years here and no sign of any eye damage! I feel so very fortunate.
__________________
Liz from Michigan
dxed 6/64 - pumping with Animas 1250 since 11/09/06 and using Dexcom7 since 2/15/08
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:19 PM
cheryl's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tenessee
Posts: 1,430
Nothing yet but one broken blood vessel i dunno what that means but the eye dr wasn't concerned cause he said it was clearing up or it looked like it was already healing when he found it.....

I am 16 yrs with D myself had lots of dental issue's though....loads of them.
__________________
Don't know who I want as president, but I know I don't want to live like a communist....ENOUGH SAID.....

March a1c 6.4
Pumper 522 with Humalog
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 12:52 AM
HiImDan's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cleveland, Oh
Posts: 2,097
Diabetes for nearly 30 years (first three untreated, thanks dr. hostetler) I've had around 20 laser treatments in my right eye, 5 in my left plus a fame four experiment that made matters worse. I'm legally blind.
__________________
"Blessed is the man, who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact."
- George Eliot (1819-1880)

Here's my pet, GodzillaTime to switch to decaf, eh?

Isaiah 32:5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal...

Better to remain silent and assumed a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
-Socrates

A wise man speaks cuz he has something to say, a fool speaks cuz he has to say something.
-Plato
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 04:53 AM
Gordonm's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 716
33 years and no problems. My eye Dr. said there are no signs of any damage. I feel lucky about this as the first 15 years were not the best of control. We just did not have the resources or products we have now.
__________________
Type 1 since 4/74
Pump user since 10/17/06!
MM 522 pump
CGMS started 10/3/08
A1C 5/08: 6.0
A1C 10/08 5.7
Bike miles this year: 2332 miles
Keep on pedaling
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 01:30 PM
Banned
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 301
Then of course there are those that have < 10 years diabetes experience and have already been lasered. And who said being young and stupid was fun?

But - I've read something that was rather interesting that Jedi had posted in another thread. He said something along the lines that if one had to choose, that it would be better to run consistently high rather than consistently swaying from low-to-high-to-low and so on. It's strange that after four years of running an A1C of 13+ that I didn't have any problems except for some slight neuropathy. Since starting back on a plan - that's when I noticed my eyes went down hill. Perhaps it caught up with or maybe it was better to run consistently high rather than swing from 60-180 and back down. Who knows?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:52 AM
belyro's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjames View Post
It's strange that after four years of running an A1C of 13+ that I didn't have any problems except for some slight neuropathy. Since starting back on a plan - that's when I noticed my eyes went down hill. Perhaps it caught up with or maybe it was better to run consistently high rather than swing from 60-180 and back down. Who knows?
This is my case too. I didn't have an A1C of 13+....it was typically in the 8s, but it was only when I started getting my diabetes under control and bring my A1C down that I started to get more hemmoraging, and now the proliferative. *big sigh*
__________________
~ Bethany ~

Type 1 since I was 3 (1981) - 26 years now
Pumping as of Sept. 13, 2007 - Paradigm 522 with NovoRapid (Novolog)
(Previously on Levemir and Humalog)
CGMS as of Apr. 2008
Laser treatments (scatter) on both eyes - Jul. 4, 2007-Sept. 12, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 07:14 AM
xMenace's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 7,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by belyro View Post
This is my case too. I didn't have an A1C of 13+....it was typically in the 8s, but it was only when I started getting my diabetes under control and bring my A1C down that I started to get more hemmoraging, and now the proliferative. *big sigh*
The Grunter, my optho, says there's no medical basis for this theory. They were going to bleed anyway.
__________________
Michael Pollan on CBC

In Defense of Food with Michael Pollan


T1 1975, MM 722 pump

10/08
A1C 7/08 6.1%
HDL - 1.74 (67)
LDL - 1.89 (73)
Triglicerides - 0.52 (47.0)


7/08
A1C 7/08 5.9%
HDL - 1.55 (59.9)
LDL - 1.76 (68.1)
Triglicerides - 0.44 (40.0)

John
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:43 AM
belyro's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by xMenace View Post
The Grunter, my optho, says there's no medical basis for this theory. They were going to bleed anyway.
But then why does it happen so often?
__________________
~ Bethany ~

Type 1 since I was 3 (1981) - 26 years now
Pumping as of Sept. 13, 2007 - Paradigm 522 with NovoRapid (Novolog)
(Previously on Levemir and Humalog)
CGMS as of Apr. 2008
Laser treatments (scatter) on both eyes - Jul. 4, 2007-Sept. 12, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:53 AM
cheryl's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tenessee
Posts: 1,430
OMG, me too, i don't have what you consider damage as far as I know with my eyes, but when I went back in Nov. and had the broken vessel this was after I was gaining back control and not living in the 300's-400's anymore......I will see what goes on in August i have to go back then to make sure there is no new damage.......could be a link there...

Cheryl
__________________
Don't know who I want as president, but I know I don't want to live like a communist....ENOUGH SAID.....

March a1c 6.4
Pumper 522 with Humalog
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2007, 05:09 AM
KickStart101's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 3,213
After a coma and carrying my Son through
pregnancy, I had laser for PR on my left eye
only, 22 yrs. after being dxd. No others needed.

I had my Ophtho appt. on Tues. and he's
Happy, I'm Happy. My eyes look Great
and he doesn't want to see me 'til June/08.
Unless I need him sooner, of course, which I
won't(kow). I'm 45+ yrs. since diagnosis.
__________________
Type 1 for 46 yrs.
%%%%%%%%%%
Dxd. Dec./1961
%%%%%%%%%%
MDI ~
%%%%%%%%%%
***CARLIE***
~*~*~*~*~*~
*Good Luck 07-08 Sens*
~*~*~*~*~*~

~~~~
%%%%%%%%%%
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2007, 11:04 AM
Mich's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,288
Why some cases of retinopathy worsen when diabetic control improves

Here are some references from the search using the above words and Google. I believe most of these studies cite the improved circulation in the retina and the increase in VEGF (endothelial growth factor) that are a result of tighter control.

In this 1985 paper:
Dah-Jorgensen Dahl-Jorgensen K, et al. . Rapid Tightening of blood glucose control leads to transient deterioration of retinopathy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: The Oslo Study Br Med J 1985. 290: 811-815.

At this site: Proliferative Retinopathy (DiabeticRetinopathy.org.uk)

(quotes from the above)

A sudden improvement in control will lead to a temporary rapid increase in progression of retinopathy: laser may be needed.

Good control is important in the longer term, that is after about 2 years, when people who control their diabetes well will be better off. See

A temporary increase in retinopathy is most common when starting insulin for the first time, especially if the diabetes is very badly controlled when you start the insulin.

And iIn this article: Why some cases of retinopathy worsen when diabetic control improves -- Chantelau and Kohner 315 (7116): 1105 -- BMJ

Mich
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 PM.

For Advertising:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32