Diabetes Forums » Living with Diabetes » Diabetes » Which is more Severe?


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Reply
Which is more Severe? LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:44 AM
Injecto's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,417
Which is more Severe?

Type 1 or Type 2?

I only ask because I find that articles that usually focus on Type 2 diabetes tend to describe Type 1 as "the more severe form" of diabetes. Yet, with all the stats on what happens to diabetics, it seems that Type 1s are more likely to have a better long term outcome IF they take care of themselves.

Thoughts? Opinions?
__________________
Type 1
Dx'd Oct 2, 2006
Medtronic pumper - NovoRapid
Drusens in both eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:52 AM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,810
Type 1 is more severe because there tend to be much wider flucuations in blood sugar, and the severe ends of the spectrum- severe hypos and dka- tend to happen here. Also, it requires insulin the whole time, which some people think is bad, and usually people are much sicker at diagnosis. Type 1 can also be looked at as more severe because if you're diagnosed as a kid, you're going to have it for much longer, and thus have much more of a chance to get complications, than someone with type 1.

Type 2 is more severe because it can reak havoc on your body uncontrolled for years before it's diagnosed. Thus "silent killer." Also, it becomes more severe in the sense that sometimes people think it's less severe and ignore it, thus causing more complications. Type 2 is more severe because there are often a lot of comorbities that further contribute to complications- obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension to name a few.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 12:18 PM
CaptainMike's Avatar
Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunshine State (of Confusion)
Posts: 227
With No (Zero) treatment, Type 1 will kill you a heck of a lot faster than Type 2. I'd guess that is why it is oft referred to as "More Severe"

Mke
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 07:56 PM
Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 353
Type 1 may be more severe, but I'd rather have it than type 2 any day. Constant insulin resistance and having a disease that the news is constantly linking with obesity and therefore social criticism and blame? ...... PFFFT!!!! Plus, the "cure" that's been 5 years away for the past 30 years is for type 1's. My Dad has type 2, is not at all obese, and I'm glad I'm standing in my own shoes instead of his.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:06 PM
xMenace's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 7,119
Type 2 seems to be constantly changing. It's hard to get a handle on things when your physiological landscape keeps changing. Type 1 is much easier to control because it's a fairly static regimine.
__________________
Michael Pollan on CBC

In Defense of Food with Michael Pollan


T1 1975, MM 722 pump

10/08
A1C 7/08 6.1%
HDL - 1.74 (67)
LDL - 1.89 (73)
Triglicerides - 0.52 (47.0)


7/08
A1C 7/08 5.9%
HDL - 1.55 (59.9)
LDL - 1.76 (68.1)
Triglicerides - 0.44 (40.0)

John
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:07 PM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by xMenace View Post
Type 2 seems to be constantly changing. It's hard to get a handle on things when your physiological landscape keeps changing. Type 1 is much easier to control because it's a fairly static regimine.
I disagree. My diabetes changes quite often. What works some days doesn't other days.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:56 PM
SharpTail's Avatar
Junior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paris, Ontario
Posts: 56
My best description of Type 1 is a condition where you are under total manual control, balancing food and dosage of insulin. For individuals who can maintain good discipline and focus they will likely live a long time without "life span" reducing complications. Probably one advantage of Type 1 is the younger age of diagnosis compared to Type 2. A younger person is more likely to adapt to the lifestyle required to survive the disease than an older person.

The comparative analogy for Type 2 is a condition where some automatic control still exists at least initially. The problems I see relate to diagnosis after the disease has already taken a toll on the body and the difficulty adapting to a different lifestyle.

I think Type 1 diabetes has the potential to be less severe than Type 2, but if out of control the negative consequences will become evident very quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:59 PM
RobiJo's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Royal Oak, Michigan
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by LancetChick View Post
Type 1 may be more severe, but I'd rather have it than type 2 any day. Constant insulin resistance and having a disease that the news is constantly linking with obesity and therefore social criticism and blame? ...... PFFFT!!!! Plus, the "cure" that's been 5 years away for the past 30 years is for type 1's. My Dad has type 2, is not at all obese, and I'm glad I'm standing in my own shoes instead of his.
Me too! I'd take T1 over T2 anyday. Funny that I'm reading this post tonight as my husband and I were driving home from my in-laws. T2's often frustrate me beyond belief (no offense to anyone here!) b/c of their lack of knowledge and acceptance. Some of this is the fault of doctors who do not educate after they diagnos folks with pre-D, T2. Taking insulin does not mean I'm on my death bed. I am not diabetic because I ate to much sugar, I am not fat, I do not have the "bad" kind of diabetes, and I most definately not going to be okay if I just take the pills. (You don't have to take shots...just take the pills for that!!! I think NOT!) Oh and YES I do plan to eat that piece of cake (and take 2 units for it!) [RobiJo will now hop off of her soap box]

Back to the question though, I think both are severe--more severe for those who fail to understand what D is (and what it isn't).
__________________

Type 1 Est.1984
MM 722 and CGMS; Humalog & Symlin
a1c Trying to get below 6...
6.8 (9.10.08)
Vitrectomies May 2007 & July 2007
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:16 PM
tanyatype1's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,879
When I was first diagnosed, my hubby and I asked the specialist which kind of Diabetes was the worst to have because we didn't have a clue! He said that was a tough question to answer because of all of the variables, but if he had to choose one to have himself, it would be Type 1. That says a lot to me.
__________________


Happiness isn't getting what you want.....
It's wanting what you've got.

Last A1C - 5.9
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:27 PM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanyatype1 View Post
When I was first diagnosed, my hubby and I asked the specialist which kind of Diabetes was the worst to have because we didn't have a clue! He said that was a tough question to answer because of all of the variables, but if he had to choose one to have himself, it would be Type 1. That says a lot to me.
He probably tells the type 2s he'd rather be type 2.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:31 PM
tanyatype1's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,879
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funnygrl View Post
He probably tells the type 2s he'd rather be type 2.
LOL! You ARE a funny girl!
__________________


Happiness isn't getting what you want.....
It's wanting what you've got.

Last A1C - 5.9
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:37 PM
Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobiJo View Post
....Taking insulin does not mean I'm on my death bed. I am not diabetic because I ate to much sugar, I am not fat, I do not have the "bad" kind of diabetes, and I most definately not going to be okay if I just take the pills. (You don't have to take shots...just take the pills for that!!! I think NOT!) Oh and YES I do plan to eat that piece of cake (and take 2 units for it!) [RobiJo will now hop off of her soap box]

Back to the question though, I think both are severe--more severe for those who fail to understand what D is (and what it isn't).
Totally agree... Diabetes is severe for anyone who has any type who doesn't educate themselves about it.

At the end of the day, I think T1's at least have a somewhat clearer message from the medical community and a clear path of treatment with the only truly effective treatment - insulin. T2's (like myself) are too often subjected to endless experiments with bizzare oral medications that seem to have more side effects than benefits. The consensus in the Medical community has been (until recently it seems) that the best way to deal with T2 is to exhaust every stupid oral toxin before prescribing insulin. This journey is not only frustrating, but exhausting and depressing.
__________________
If you find yourself in a hole...stop digging

Diagnosed: T2 - 2003
MDI: Lantus / Novolog
Meter: Wavesense Presto
Last A1c - 5.6 - 08/2008
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:19 AM
HelenM's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 803
Uncontrolled they are both severe. I've read too many sad stories of young people with type 1 suffering severe complications in their 20s as a result of normal adolescent rebellion. Similarly their are many (most?) people with type 2 who think its just a mild ailment 'a touch of diabetes' and may not realise its potential problems until too late.
Like others I think type 1 seems easier to deal with, a mechanical calculation of food intake, physical activity and insulin dosage (OK perhaps not that simple but I'm very glad I don't have to throw insulin resistance into the mix.) The sufferers are also more likely to be treated by specialists getting (often) better education and treatment.
Personally I'm glad I had the best of both worlds, type 1.5 diagnosed later in life so no illness to deal with as a child or young person. Relatively little behaviour modification needed, just a constant reminder to live a healthy lifestyle coupled with frequent medical checkups. The downside perhaps(though hopefully not) is that the long honeymoon period before diagnosis may have left as yet undiscovered problems.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2007, 06:15 AM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 3,293
Like CaptainMike said... a person T1 without insulin would not last very long. A person T2 would I guess.

I hate that stupid disease so much, my heart goes out to anyone who has diabetes, T1, 1.5, and T2. I know some people have a really bad time, some are dying from it, it just makes me feel powerless at times. I often think about those little ones with diabetes, they should be carefree and playing, but they have to learn about carbs, and shots, and A1C, and BG, they go through highs and lows, and sometimes many hospital trips. They're just kids! For me diabetes is severe, full stop. And I wish we could just irradicate this stupid disease from the planet once and for all.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2007, 06:25 AM
Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 362
I'd probably say Type 1 is more severe short term and that type 2 is more severe long term.

But as a Type 2, I don't particularly think the Type 1 grass looks greener.

They both suck...
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 PM.

For Advertising:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32