Diabetes Forums » Living with Diabetes » Diabetes » Up for a little experiment?


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Reply
Up for a little experiment? LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2004, 03:56 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 74
Up for a little experiment?

Is anyone interested in collecting a little data about the forum? Specifically, I'm curious how many people do various regimens and whether those different strategies have any consistent implications for A1c's and cholesterol levels.

For example, my most recent stats would be:

Type 1, Pump, Moderate carb diet (~160/day??), test around 7x/day, exercise 5 days/week: HbA1c 5.2, Blood Pressure (BP) 110/80, HDL 62, LDL 101, Triglycerides 38, LP(a) 76.

Should we add any categories (e.g. years with diabetes?)? Does anyone else share my interest in looking for patterns like Lower carbs => higher HDL. I know a lot of this information is probably in scientific studies, but I thought a Forums survey would be kind of cool. Maybe we could even look at changes over time if people find this sort of thing interesting/informative.

Thanks,
David
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2004, 01:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 74
To those who responded to this survey request in the Carbohydrates Poll section, THANK YOU!

For those who have viewed this thread, is it a lack of interest that has kept you from responding, or is something else holding you back?

Maybe the potential benefits are not clear. One hope in doing this is that we could keep a history of people's routines and their progress over time so that if certain dietary changes occur and then later better blood sugars occur, we can see that history.

If we could do this anonymously to a secure online database where we could keep track of our own information but no one knew whose was whose but they could still do searches on it or look at group level statistics if interested, would that interest anyone?

I think there is still a lot to be learned about diabetes, such as what the effects of frequent mild to moderate lows are (if any), and whether low carb + high fat consistently produces better lipid profiles and more stable blood sugars or whether there are consistent exceptions to these general patterns.

Anyway, any feedback about these ideas would be greatly appreciated. Hope everyone is having a wonderful weekend!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2004, 02:10 PM
KLD KLD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 495
I was extremely interested in your idea, David and, in fact, I think it would be very valuable. I did respond to the poll, but I haven't replied to this thread, although I wanted to. My reasons are a little complex. First, I guess I was waiting for someone else to start and nobody did. Second, I have been accused of being overly zealous on the subject of managing diabetes with a low carb diet, and I wasn't sure whether my contribution would be welcomed. If you decide to go ahead with it, I would be delighted to take part.

It doesn't matter to me in the least whether it's anonymous or not, but I think it might be a good idea to develop a questionnaire for us to respond to. That would ensure that our responses are in a similar format, making it easier to compare. We could still add our own comments if we wanted to.

Still on this subject, I am amazed that there have been so few formal studies comparing the long-term effects of different ways of controlling diabetes. There have been several very small studies which show that low carb is most effective, but those that disagree are able to argue that, because they are so small and so short-term, they are insignificant. Some of them also didn't use a full range of possibilities, e.g. one I recall compared a lower carb/low fat diet to a high carb/low fat diet. But my diet is low, not lower carb (under 50 g/day) and high fat. I would like to see a comprehensive study over a few years, including keeping track of the complications that develop among the participants over that time.

Karen
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2004, 06:30 PM
HeatherP's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,868
Honestly? Somedays there's just only so much detail I can assimilate and then my eyes start spinning in different directions. Sorry!

HeatherP
__________________


To err is human, to purr feline >^.^<

T1 since 1991, Cozmo Pump 11/05
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 12:10 AM
stooge4444's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Reno, NV & Irvine, CA
Posts: 58
I definitely would.........I'm going to be having my bloodwork done soon so that I will post then............
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 02:37 AM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 3,293
Was thinking the same! Having all the bloodwork done soon.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 07:34 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 102
Well, lemme go first!

Type 1, Humalog Pen, Lantus syringe, Carb diet - none followed, test around 4x/day, exercise 0 days/week: HbA1c 8.5, Blood Pressure (BP) 100/75, HDL 60, LDL 85, Triglycerides 47.


Lemme know your research results!

P.S. Diabetic for 10 years.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 08:57 AM
KLD KLD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 495
Here are my latest numbers. We use mmol/L in Canada rather than the mg/dL used in the US, so I'll list both:

Total cholesterol: 4.7 (182)
LDL: 2.8 (108)
HDL: 1.6 (62)
Triglycerides: 0.6 (53)

HbA1C: 5.0%
Blood pressure: 113/75

Diet: low carb (fewer than 50 g per day) for over two years
Exercise: no formal exercise
Type 2 for 7 years

Karen

Last edited by KLD : 10-26-2004 at 09:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 11:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 74
Thanks all for your replies!!! I'll plan on sending out periodic summaries as information comes in, and if people think of any other data they want to include (e.g. some have added how long they've had diabetes--thanks!) that is great.
Looking forward to getting to make and share some graphs,
David
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2004, 11:38 PM
KLD KLD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 495
David, I forgot to mention that I control my blood sugar with diet only. Could you add that, please.

Karen
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2004, 06:40 PM
Harold's Avatar
Super Moderator
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do Dah, OZ, aka Kansas
Posts: 4,602
Re: Up for a little experiment?

Hope your really good at doing something like this and already set up to do it, and/or have a lot of time on your hands.

Should you be adding more catagories, you bet and you have not even started. Without them what you come will not really mean anything. What other catagories? Well let's start with exercise as an example do you, don't you, aerobic, resistant, or a combination of. Probably need to add how much which may mean for how long, far, and to what intensity. Add to that BMI, AGE, LIFESTYLE(ACTIVE OR SEDENTARY), MEDICATIONS(INCLUDING DOSAGES), other DESEASES AND CONDITIONS. I'm sure there are others, but this would be a good start.

As for your CARB POLL I did not partake in it for the reason that you lumped everyone into the same amount of carbs in complete disregard to what their caloric requirements are. In short a person is restricted to the same amount of carbs if they burn a 1000 calories or 3000 calories a day.
__________________
LIFE IS NOT A JOURNEY TO THE GRAVE WITH THE INTENTION OF
ARRIVING SAFELY IN A PRETTY AND WELL-PRESERVED BODY, BUT RATHER TO
SKID IN BROADSIDE, THOROUGHLY USED UP, TOTALLY WORN OUT, AND LOUDLY
PROCLAIMING..."WOW! WHAT A RIDE!"

"Reality is what does't go away when you stop believing in it..."
-PHILIP K. DICK

Last A1c 6.3% up 0.1 5/22/08 Lab Range 4.5 - 5.9

Avandia 8mg 6/01
Januvia 25mg 6/7/08
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2004, 02:01 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 74
KLD, yep, I can add that

Harold, thanks for the constructive criticism and suggestions. If people could add that sort of information to their posts, that would be great. I also appreciate your point about the Carb Poll and tried to put in approximations, but I agree that those data are not as reliable as your suggestion. Percentages of carbs, protein, and fat, along with total calories will hopefully work better for this survey.

Does anyone know how to put a Microsoft Access database on the web? I've recently come across terms like .asp, but know next to nothing about this sort of thing. Anyway, any suggested resources for publishing Access databases to the web would be greatly appreciated, especially if they're geared to complete novices.

Thanks,
David
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 PM.

For Advertising:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32