Diabetes Forums » Staying Healthy » Dieting » FDA contemplating crackdown on salt


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Reply
FDA contemplating crackdown on salt LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:17 AM
xMenace's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 6,799
FDA contemplating crackdown on salt

Article


EPA
INDULGING: More than 75 percent of the salt the average American consumes comes from processed foods and restaurant meals.


The AMA, which says Americans should consume 50% less sodium, has joined consumer groups asking for government intervention.
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

November 29, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Best known for deciding whether medications are safe and effective, the Food and Drug Administration is weighing whether to crack down on plain old salt, which doctors say is harmful in the quantities most Americans consume.

At a hearing today, the agency will begin collecting expert testimony on the role excess salt in the diet plays in causing high blood pressure, heart disease and strokes. An increasingly vocal medical community has joined consumer groups to demand government intervention, and the review could lead to federal limits on the salt content of processed foods such as canned soups and breakfast cereals.

In a carefully calibrated response, the food industry has acknowledged a problem but has called for voluntary solutions rather than government regulation. More than 75% of the salt the average American consumes comes from processed foods and restaurant meals.

At issue is whether the FDA should change its official classification of salt as "GRAS" -- Generally Recognized as Safe -- and instead declare it a food additive subject to limitations.

The Bush administration, often loath to impose new regulations, may have an added incentive to act in this case: It is planning to launch a national campaign against obesity, particularly among children. And salty foods contribute to the problem, because people often wash down their hot dogs and potato chips with beverages rich in sugar.

"Normally they're not drinking water, they're drinking soda," said Dr. Stephen Havas of the American Medical Assn., citing estimates that soft drinks, beer and wine consumed with salty foods add about 280 calories a day to the American diet. "That's huge," he said.

FDA officials say they view excess salt in the diet as a serious public health issue, but the agency is keeping its options open.

"We certainly recognize that it's a big problem for a lot of people, and consumers should have choices if they want to reduce their salt intake," said Laura Tarantino, director of the FDA's office of food additive safety, who is taking a leading role in the agency's review.

The agency's involvement is long overdue, some activists say.

"For the first time in 25 years, the FDA is showing an interest in lowering sodium levels in the food supply," said Michael F. Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer group that petitioned the agency to take action.

Jacobson's group had been waging a campaign to get the FDA's attention, but prospects for action improved markedly after the AMA made it a top priority last year. "We came to the conclusion that the evidence is overwhelming," Havas said.

Too much sodium has been linked in scientific studies to high blood pressure, a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke.

The National Academy of Sciences recommends that adults consume no more than 2,300 milligrams of sodium daily, roughly the amount in a teaspoon of salt. The target is lower -- 1,500 milligrams -- for people at higher risk for high blood pressure, including those over 50 and African Americans.

Americans typically consume about 4,000 milligrams of sodium daily.

The AMA cites estimates that 150,000 lives could be saved annually if the nation were to reduce its sodium consumption by 50%, a goal the doctors' group says can be attained within a decade.

It probably can't happen without the cooperation of the food industry, and producers are skeptical.

"Claims about [low] salt are often a turnoff for consumers," said Robert Earl, senior director of nutrition policy for the Food Products Assn., a trade organization. "Consumers automatically think it means the food isn't going to taste good."

But Jacobson said his group's research shows that the sodium content of the same types of packaged foods can vary dramatically. For example, Contadina tomato paste has 237% more salt than Hunt's -- although Contadina tomato sauce has 33% less sodium than Hunt's. Such findings suggest there's room to lower sodium levels without affecting taste, Jacobson said.

Regulators in other industrialized countries already have begun grappling with the problem. In Finland, government and industry have collaborated to bring about a 40% decrease in sodium consumption since the late 1970s, according to the AMA. In the United Kingdom, government regulators set voluntary sodium reduction targets for about 70 kinds of processed foods.

U.S. consumers seeking low-sodium foods complain of few choices and higher prices. For example, canned soups are considered a good alternative for people who are interested in cutting down on fatty foods. But many soups are high in sodium, and the low-salt versions often cost more.

Earl, the industry expert, said the FDA should consider ways to entice companies to lower sodium content instead of imposing requirements.

For example, the agency could create a new category of lower-sodium foods, one that does not require a steep initial cut in salt content.

"Carrots will be more effective than sticks, and incentives to continue to gradually reduce the sodium content over time are going to be more effective than a very abrupt reduction," he said.

"Voluntary action is very important, and it could bring sodium levels down more quickly than regulation," Jacobson said. "But not every company will do it. And voluntary action can be easily reversed. Regulation is more durable."

ricardo.alonso-zaldivar@

latimes.com
__________________
Michael Pollan on CBC

In Defense of Food with Michael Pollan


T1 1975, MM 722 pump
A1C 7/08 5.9%
HDL - 1.55 (59.9)
LDL - 1.76 (68.1)
Triglicerides - 0.44 (40.0)

John


Postcards received: 16 of 20
Postcards sent: 20 of 20
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:40 AM
Banned
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 3,316
good idea....but will it cost more? most foods that are "low sodium" cost more than their higher sodium counterparts! trish
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:47 AM
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK, Hampshire
Posts: 599
and the reason cited for eating less salt is....

... is that it will stop people getting fat.

Quote:
The Bush administration, often loath to impose new regulations, may have an added incentive to act in this case: It is planning to launch a national campaign against obesity, particularly among children. And salty foods contribute to the problem, because people often wash down their hot dogs and potato chips with beverages rich in sugar.

"Normally they're not drinking water, they're drinking soda," said Dr. Stephen Havas of the American Medical Assn., citing estimates that soft drinks, beer and wine consumed with salty foods add about 280 calories a day to the American diet. "That's huge," he said.
I had to re-read that bit just to make sure I had read it right - genius.

SALT MAKES YOU FAT scream the headlines.

this isn't new...

<yawn>

this is yet another petition by the CSPI to get salt regulated...

they did so in 1978, 1981, 1984 - all of the petitions were rejected. They also tried taking the FDA to court, but that petition was also rejected.

The basis of not revoking GRAS status was that at the levels typically consumed there was no evidence that salt was poisonous or had a deleterious effect.

there is no evidence that reducing salt intake makes any difference to mortality either.

in clinical studies - significant salt reductions at best only achieve a drop of around 1-2 mmHg - clinically this isn't significant (plus no BP machine can measure BP changes this small).

A small number of people experience salt sensitive hypertension, and for these people salt reductions are beneficial.

amusingly reducing salt can actually cause BP to rise in about 25% of people.

oh and have you heard the one about salt and insulin resistance - apparently increasing salt intake decreases insulin resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:03 AM
JediSkipdogg's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,289
Not another stupid government regulation. That's all I have to say on that.
__________________
●Blue Ash, Ohio Police Dispatcher
●Type 1 diabetic for 25 years (11 months old)
●Animas pumper since December of 2002
~IR 1000 (Dec. 2002-Jan. 2005)
~IR 1200 (Jan. 2005 - ?)
●LifeScan OneTouch UltraSmart

Diabetes is an Art, NOT a Science. You must master the control by skills and not by knowledge alone.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:06 AM
blacklightmike's Avatar
Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 387
Simply put, prepare your own food when you can. Breakfast cereals with lots of salt? Whoa...
__________________
-Mike

"I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong." -Richard Feynman

ACTOS 30mg
PRANDIN 2mg x 3
BYETTA 10 mcg x 2
SYNTHROID 300 mcg
COZAAR 100 mg
TRICOR 145 mg
QUINAPRIL 10 mg
METFORMIN 500 mg
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:18 AM
EasyType2's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 543
Reducing salt consumption is probably a good thing for most of us; however, dumping responsibility on the FDA is like pouring gasoline on a fire. The FDA is unable to ensure that the food we eat is not contaminated with deadly pathogens; how can they possibly devote resources to salt regulation?
__________________
I was born with nothing and I've still got most of it.
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:27 AM.

For Advertising:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32