Welcome to Diabetes Forums!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|  | | 
12-09-2007, 01:06 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 538
| | | Low fat diet advice please After finally getting a handle on the low carb diet I now find that I must also reduce my fat intake (high triglycerides reading). I swear this disease is determined to make a vegetarian out of me.
From what I've been reading there are basically four types of dietary fat. Two bad (saturated and trans fat) and two good (monounsaturated and polyunsaturated). At my current calorie level I've been told to limit my "total fat" intake to 60 grams per day. What I'm wondering is why the limit on "good fat"? Is too much good fat bad for you? How much good fat is too much? Wouldn't it be easier to simply limit the bad fats? If only limiting bad fats, what would be a daily limit considered "low fat"?
__________________ The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. | 
12-09-2007, 01:52 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK, Hampshire
Posts: 625
| | | I'm sorry I can't advise you on what are the best fats - I personally don't find the evidence very convincing, but that it is another story.
However, and I apologise if you've already sussed this, but you can't eat a low fat AND a low carb diet.
You can do one or the other, but not both. While there is little evidence of harm, no human diet (that I know of) goes much higher than 30% calories as protein. 35% would be an absolute maximum - besides which it's very hard to eat high protein, without also eating high fat.
typical intakes for protein range between 15%-25%. The rest of your calories is balanced between carbs and fat.
so a typical low carb diet would be 20% carbs, 20% protein and 60% fat, while a typical high carb low fat diet would be 55% carbs, 20% protein and 25% fat.
you have to choose...
at the end of the day eating less fat means eating more carbs. | 
12-09-2007, 01:53 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,736
| | | There has much said that bad carbs are the source of bad triglycerides. I had high triglycerides before my diabetes and at diagnosis. I went good carb and the triglyceride problem went away.
Bad fats are the ones that are modified such as anything hydrogenated. That is the simple answer.
Funny thing is the bad carbs are usually paired with the bad fats in processed foods.
__________________
Diabetes is a condition that you have to manage or it will manage you. The care team is only there in a supporting role
| 
12-09-2007, 02:40 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,146
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by wiseguy ... I now find that I must also reduce my fat intake (high triglycerides reading). ..... | While dietary fat does get broken down into triglycerides, the main cause of high triglycerides is carbohydrate. And the more insulin resistant you are, the bigger that effect tends to be. Soon after it is consumed, carbohydrate is broken down into glucose. But if it can't get into cells because of insulin resistance, this glucose finds its way to the liver where it is converted into triglycerides. This is why people with metabolic syndrome and/or type 2 diabetes often have very high triglycerides. And why replacing carbo with fat in the diet normally reduces triglycerides.
If this is not happening with you, perhaps it is a reflection of your insulin resistance. Giving it more time may help as it takes a while to become "fat adapted". Cutting back on fat essentially mean that you have to eat more carb to maintain your weight, and that won't help. IMO, the only fat that should be restricted is trans fat. In addition to reducing tri's, getting your calories from saturated fat also increases your HDL ("good" cholesterol). 
__________________
In my humble opinion
Type1 since 1977
MDI using Lantus, Novorapid and Actrapid
| 
12-09-2007, 03:32 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,846
| | | Personally, I try to limit fats to the good fats, without keeping track of those. The only bad fats I have are pretty much my weekly chicken wings and my bi-monthly smoked baby back ribs (homemade, of course). I probably eat more grams of protein than carbs on any given day, but I try to only eat good carbs (no refined sugars, breads or high glycemic index carbs).
I am overweight, I don't exercise enough, and I do have fairly high insulin resistance. My ISF is about 20 (1 unit of insulin will drop me 20 units in about 4 hours) and my I:C ratio is 1 unit per 5 grams of carbs. I go through 50 to 100 units of insulin per day.
I had an a1c of 5.4 and my triglycerides were 58 as of last week. You don't have to become a vegetarian to control your bg and triglycerides. Good luck...
__________________
You may call me Locutus | 
12-09-2007, 04:04 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK, Hampshire
Posts: 625
| | from what I have read - insulin resistance can contribute to raised triglyceride levels. High triglycerides are considered a symptom of metabolic syndrome.
my understanding is that high fat diets can increase insulin resistance - although the evidence for this isn't very strong, and the effect probably isn't very significant. Calorie restriction significantly improves insulin resistance and is the source of all those miracle cures we keep hearing about - well at least that's my conviction.
anyway some good fat advice (with some real proper honest to goodness solid evidence to back it up)
if you want to lower your triglycerides then increase your omega 3 intake. AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality - a branch of US gov) conducted a systematic review of the effect of omega 3 on cardiovascular risk factors, and they concluded Quote: |
A large, consistent beneficial effect of omega-3 fatty acids was found only for triglyceride levels.
| they concluded that omega 3 increased total cholesterol and LDL a small amount, while lowering HDL levels - both in the wrong direction Health Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease: Structured Abstract
You can read the full PDF document from this page if you wish. They concluded that omega 3 supplementation could reduce triglycerides by 10-25%. Greatest reductions were seen in those with the highest triglyceride levels.
However it has to be borne in mind that the clinical studies all used pharmacological quantities of omega 3 - dosage was between 1g and 6g daily. 6g was considered maximum as it was believed that there was no therapeutic benefit to omega 3 supplementation beyond these levels. You would need to consult your doctor before taking these kind of levels of omega 3, and one other caveat...
I couldn't find a mention of omega 3 on triglyceride levels in type 2 diabetes, so the results may not hold for this group. | 
12-09-2007, 06:22 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 538
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by REDLAN However, and I apologise if you've already sussed this, but you can't eat a low fat AND a low carb diet. | This of course would be relevant to what you consider "low carb" and "low fat". My low carb diet consists of under 20 carbs per meal and a maximum of 80 carbs per day. The doctor says to keep total fat to under 60 grams per day. I have been able to meet both these criteria over the past week.
__________________ The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. | 
12-09-2007, 06:32 PM
|  | Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Cicero, IL
Posts: 199
| | | Hi, I am on a very low carb diet and initally during the diet your triglycerides will increase due to weight loss. But my body has adjusted. Look at my triglyceride level. I eat bacon, ham, steak(no fat trimming) pork chops. I use coconut oil to fry my eggs in. I use butter on all of my vegetables and olive oil and vinegar for my salad dressings. I personally don't believe that eating fat is the cause of high triglycerides or all eskimos would be taking cholesterol medication!
__________________ Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic!
Diagnosed type 2 on 11-11-06. Wgt 251, A1C 6.1
Diet control only!
Currently 177 lbs, A1C 5.6, cholesterol 160, LDL 95,HDL
53, triglycerides 37. BP 110/70
| 
12-09-2007, 08:35 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,846
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by REDLAN However, and I apologise if you've already sussed this, but you can't eat a low fat AND a low carb diet.
You can do one or the other, but not both. While there is little evidence of harm, no human diet (that I know of) goes much higher than 30% calories as protein. 35% would be an absolute maximum - besides which it's very hard to eat high protein, without also eating high fat. | Why not? That's how I eat. Some days I eat practically no carbs at all, while still eating low fat...
__________________
You may call me Locutus | 
12-10-2007, 12:32 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK, Hampshire
Posts: 625
| | | I think there is some misunderstanding/disagreement as to the meaning of "low" - in this case low carb or low fat.
My understanding is that the low refers to the relative contribution each nutrient makes to total calories. A typical low carb diet is 20% or less total calories to come from carbs. This is the meaning applied in scientific nomenclature.
I would suggest that using it to refer to quantities, means that in practice low fat AND low carb actually means a low calorie intermediate carb and intermediate fat diet.
wiseguys example...
80g of carbs and 60g of fat would give a total of around 860 calories.
assuming a welterweight 2000 calorie daily requirement, this is still a lot of protein - 285g or so
this translates to around 1kg of grilled rump steak (according to my diet book, this is cooked not uncooked weight). Interestingly this would give you around 50g of fat - so your daily allowance of fat from other sources is just 10g
you could substitute chicken breast instead to give yourself more leeway, but this still translates to around 1 kilo of chicken .
I personally don't see how such a diet is sustainable in the long term.
I would suggest in reality you are looking at getting no more than around 35% of your calories from protein, which translates to around 1300 daily calories- this is a very low calorie diet, and I really don't see how you can maintain this for any length of time.
this is what I was getting at - hope that clarifies things (",) | 
12-10-2007, 01:23 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,146
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg Why not? That's how I eat. Some days I eat practically no carbs at all, while still eating low fat... | Most so-called protein foods also contain a lot of fat. As a general rule, only 25% of the of the weight is in fact protein. So you would get about 25 grams of protein from a 100 gram steak, piece of fish or chicken.
Protein is relatively expensive. And there is not much point eating more that 0.8-1.2 grams per Kg of body weight every day (depending on activity level). The body doesn't need those surplus amino acids, so much of them are just converted to glucose, before it is turned into fat anyway. Excess protein is an expensive and inefficient source of energy.
__________________
In my humble opinion
Type1 since 1977
MDI using Lantus, Novorapid and Actrapid
| 
12-10-2007, 04:45 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,846
| | | For protein consumption, I try to ensure the lowest fat content possible when it comes to meats, such as fat free lunchmeats, skinless chicken breasts, 90% lean ground beef, fresh fish, lean pork, beans, eggs, etc. For me, the exceptions would be cheese, which I try to limit and my weekly chicken wings.
Of the good fats I enjoy, those would include olives and olive oil, avocados, almonds and other foods that are not high in bad fats.
I suppose I should keep track of what I eat for a few days and figure out the precentages of each nutrient...
__________________
You may call me Locutus | 
12-10-2007, 05:05 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,146
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg .... I suppose I should keep track of what I eat for a few days and figure out the precentages of each nutrient... | You can do that at FitDay - Free Weight Loss and Diet Journal . The online system is free. Enter all the food you eat and it calculates the number of calories, as well as the breakdown between the different macronutrients. It also does lots of other stuff that is useful for dieting. You may find the percentages work out quite differently to what you expect them to be. 
__________________
In my humble opinion
Type1 since 1977
MDI using Lantus, Novorapid and Actrapid
| 
12-13-2007, 11:53 AM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 538
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by REDLAN I think there is some misunderstanding/disagreement as to the meaning of "low" - in this case low carb or low fat.
My understanding is that the low refers to the relative contribution each nutrient makes to total calories. A typical low carb diet is 20% or less total calories to come from carbs. This is the meaning applied in scientific nomenclature.
I would suggest that using it to refer to quantities, means that in practice low fat AND low carb actually means a low calorie intermediate carb and intermediate fat diet.
wiseguys example...
80g of carbs and 60g of fat would give a total of around 860 calories.
assuming a welterweight 2000 calorie daily requirement, this is still a lot of protein - 285g or so
this translates to around 1kg of grilled rump steak (according to my diet book, this is cooked not uncooked weight). Interestingly this would give you around 50g of fat - so your daily allowance of fat from other sources is just 10g
you could substitute chicken breast instead to give yourself more leeway, but this still translates to around 1 kilo of chicken .
I personally don't see how such a diet is sustainable in the long term.
I would suggest in reality you are looking at getting no more than around 35% of your calories from protein, which translates to around 1300 daily calories- this is a very low calorie diet, and I really don't see how you can maintain this for any length of time.
this is what I was getting at - hope that clarifies things (",) | Actually, this daily menu consists of my usual flax seed meal muffin for breakfast (2 carbs - 24 grams fat) and a Lean Cuisine meal (20 carbs - 7 grams fat) for lunch and dinner. This leaves a little carb and fat allowance for snacking throughout the day.
But you are right, I cannot stay on this type of diet for an extended period of time.
__________________ The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. | 
12-13-2007, 12:08 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,736
| | | I was wondering if the high trigy. were new and a product of the very low carb. I'd expect the trgy. to reduce in the long term but they may rise in the first few month.
And are you building more muscle now?
And what about your alcohol intake?
I don't know the definitive answer but maybe we can come to a solution.
I agree you don't want too much protein and 1300 calorie is too low.
Maybe a good mixed salad with olive oil and vinegar would be helpful
__________________
Diabetes is a condition that you have to manage or it will manage you. The care team is only there in a supporting role
|  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |  | | » Site Navigation | | Diabetesforums.com | | | !-- gallery --> Resource Directory | | | !-- soon --> Contact Zone | | | |