PDA

View Full Version : Pills vs Activity


August
01-28-2007, 05:29 AM
I think we place far too much emphasis on medications, and not enough emphasis on muscles and fitness. After all, it's our muscles that burn the glucose not the pills or shots. The pills and shots do not BURN glucose. The conversion of glucose (and fats) to ATP (energy), takes place mostly in the muscles (80%). The pills and shots merely push the glucose into muscles, organs, and fat cells, where it can be converted to energy, or stored as body fat.

Muscle loss over time leads to hyperglycemia. Muscle building exercise (weight training) increases muscle mass, and that GREATLY reduces Insulin Resistance.

From age 25 onwards we lose 10% of our muscle mass every ten years. So by 50 we've lost 25-30% of our glucose burning capacity, by age 60, 40-55%. If our eating habits remain the same (pastry, soda, bagles, jellies and jams, pancakes with sugar syrup) then we should expect to see a significant rise in blood glucose levels.

Some people never develop a healthy amount of muscle mass, due to a disability, sedentary lifestyle, or simple laziness. Many of my diabetic friend's only physical activity is clicking a mouse all their waking hours (help/support desk workers, office workers, programmers).

Ever since the discovery of penicillin, we have looked to drug companies to invent magic pills to cure our every ill. After 25 years of Statin use there is no improvement in mortality numbers from heart disease.

What we desperately need now is a pill that will dramatically increase our muscle mass, while we sit on the sofa noshing on cheese balls and soda.

A penny for your thoughts. . . . .

--August

Harold
01-28-2007, 10:07 AM
Men reach their peak strength, muscle mass, at around the age of 28 provided they stay active that long. Staying active and using those muscles they retain them a lot longer.

ant hill
01-31-2007, 07:09 AM
It's no secret that we live in a technoloagy rich lifestyle like we don't hunt to kill and we don't walk long enough instead we have a car. we don't make food, we buy it and so on. and if you want to get off a drug then move!!!! that's all...

princesslinda
01-31-2007, 08:23 AM
I think you make a great point August. I know my sedentary lifestyle brought on my T2 diabetes. However, at diagnosis, my FBS was 215 with A1C of 9.6, so the doc started the meds to bring things down quickly. I'm really hoping that with continued weight loss, I will be able to go off the meds soon. I was told if I get A1C under 6, I could try it with diet and exercise...last A1c was 6.2, so i'm on my way!

I've noticed some had much lower levels and diagnosis and may have been in better physical shape, thus no need for meds at first.

I've read a lot lately about weight training and resistence being good for lowering levels. I've been really into cardio, but recently have added some weight training. I really hope this helps.

August
01-31-2007, 10:48 AM
To be effective weight training should be done three days a week, on a regular schedule. This is especially important when just starting. A good schedule is Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and rest up and pig out (on protein) on the week-end.

To get sugar stabilized at normal (85), relatively quickly, try the bodybuilders old standby: "The Tuna and Water Diet". It's the hardest diet I've ever done. Nothing but tuna and water, for as many days as you can stand it. Just plain drained dry tuna. No dressing. Tastes a lot like cardboard and old newspaper. I also took a good vitamin/min tab 3x/day, because tuna is lacking in same.
There are many variations of this diet. Excellent for weight(fat) loss, and muscle building (simultaneously)

Google: Tuna and water diet

princesslinda
01-31-2007, 12:07 PM
THanks for the info August. BTW, how many Tuna/Water days did you make it? I have tuna and dill pickle 3-4 days a week for lunch (no crackers or mayo) for my HDL anyway...so I don't mind plain old tuna.