PDA

View Full Version : New name for Type 1 diabetes ****


gambi
10-30-2007, 04:42 AM
Some people have probably already seen this - it made me laugh.

New name for Type 1 diabetes

Today officials at the American Diabetes Association expressed surprise that **** seems to have become the new name for what was previously known as Type 1 diabetes. That's c-r-a-p.

Speaking off the record a senior member of ADA staff was puzzled to know what **** even stood for.

Readers of this blog may know that the abbreviation was first coined in a discussion on the popular TuDiabetes social networking site. **** stands for "Catastrophic Ruthless Attack on the Pancreas"

It's rumored that someone started a Google bombing campaign to replace Google's normal results for the word **** with the ADA page for Type 1 diabetes. This was done as a protest against the ongoing problem that the media has in distinguishing between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

To quote a top ADA official (name withheld) "If this disease renaming continues we'll be forced to change current medical texts so they now refer to the two primary types of diabetes as **** and Type 2. And what happens if someone then decides to rename Type 2 to Number 2? Imagine the confusion."

They fail to recognize that many people, including many media people, are already confused so much that they don't even realize there are two main forms of diabetes that are radically different to one another. Perhaps this renaming will clear things up - a bit.

HiImDan
10-30-2007, 06:45 AM
http://bestsmileys.com/thumbs/7.gif

shiftzor
10-30-2007, 07:04 AM
Ive been reading about this, didnt realise they had come up with an acronym cr*p. Some of the theorys are that we all go through type 2 before becoming type 1, just everyone moves at a different pace. some will happen over night others will take years and years. (Double Diabetes p48 of New Scientist 27 October 2007, Science news and science jobs from New Scientist (http://www.newscientist.com)) The article did sugest a name change might be needed to clear up confusion. I guess that theory is not so radical, i can understand them renaming it, but not to this surly a better medical word is more appropriate.