PDA

View Full Version : Type 2 Cure?


xMenace
03-05-2008, 12:10 PM
Diabetes May Be Disorder Of Upper Intestine: Surgery May Correct It (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080305113659.htm)

Science News

Diabetes May Be Disorder Of Upper Intestine: Surgery May Correct It
ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2008) — Growing evidence shows that surgery may effectively cure Type 2 diabetes — an approach that not only may change the way the disease is treated, but that introduces a new way of thinking about diabetes.


A new article — published in a special supplement to the February issue of Diabetes Care by a leading expert in the emerging field of diabetes surgery — points to the small bowel as the possible site of critical mechanisms for the development of diabetes.

The study's author, Dr. Francesco Rubino of NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, presents scientific evidence on the mechanisms of diabetes control after surgery. Clinical studies have shown that procedures that simply restrict the stomach's size (i.e., gastric banding) improve diabetes only by inducing massive weight loss. By studying diabetes in animals, Dr. Rubino was the first to provide scientific evidence that gastrointestinal bypass operations involving rerouting the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., gastric bypass) can cause diabetes remission independently of any weight loss, and even in subjects that are not obese.

"By answering the question of how diabetes surgery works, we may be answering the question of how diabetes itself works," says Dr. Rubino, who is a professor in the Department of Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College and chief of gastrointestinal metabolic surgery at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell.

Dr. Rubino's prior research has shown that the primary mechanisms by which gastrointestinal bypass procedures control diabetes specifically rely on the bypass of the upper small intestine — the duodenum and jejunum. This is a key finding that may point to the origins of diabetes.

"When we bypass the duodenum and jejunum, we are bypassing what may be the source of the problem," says Dr. Rubino, who is heading up NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell's Diabetes Surgery Center.

In fact, it has become increasingly evident that the gastrointestinal tract plays an important role in energy regulation, and that many gut hormones are involved in the regulation of sugar metabolism. "It should not surprise anyone that surgically altering the bowel's anatomy affects the mechanisms that regulate blood sugar levels, eventually influencing diabetes," Dr. Rubino says.

While other gastrointestinal operations may cure diabetes as an effect of changes that improve blood sugar levels, Dr. Rubino's research findings in animals show that procedures based on a bypass of the upper intestine may work instead by reversing abnormalities of blood glucose regulation.

In fact, bypass of the upper small intestine does not improve the ability of the body to regulate blood sugar levels. "When performed in subjects who are not diabetic, the bypass of the upper intestine may even impair the mechanisms that regulate blood levels of glucose," says Dr. Rubino. In striking contrast, when nutrients' passage is diverted from the upper intestine of diabetic patients, diabetes resolves.

This, he explains, implies that the upper intestine of diabetic patients may be the site where an abnormal signal is produced, causing, or at least favoring, the development of the disease.

How exactly the upper intestine is dysfunctional remains to be seen. Dr. Rubino proposes an original explanation known in the scientific community as the "anti-incretin theory."

Incretins are gastrointestinal hormones, produced in response to the transit of nutrients, that boost insulin production. Because an excess of insulin can determine hypoglycemia (extremely low levels of blood sugar) — a life-threatening condition — Dr. Rubino speculates that the body has a counter-regulatory mechanism (or "anti-incretin" mechanism), activated by the same passage of nutrients through the upper intestine. The latter mechanism would act to decrease both the secretion and the action of insulin.

"In healthy patients, a correct balance between incretin and anti-incretin factors maintains normal excursions of sugar levels in the bloodstream," he explains. "In some individuals, the duodenum and jejunum may be producing too much of this anti-incretin, thereby reducing insulin secretion and blocking the action of insulin, ultimately resulting in Type 2 diabetes."

Indeed, in Type 2 diabetes, cells are resistant to the action of insulin ("insulin resistance"), while the pancreas is unable to produce enough insulin to overcome the resistance.

After gastrointestinal bypass procedures, the exclusion of the upper small intestine from the transit of nutrients may offset the abnormal production of anti-incretin, thereby resulting in remission of diabetes.

In order to better understand these mechanisms, and help make the potential benefits of diabetes surgery more widely available, Dr. Rubino calls for prioritizing research in diabetes surgery. "Further research on the exact molecular mechanisms of diabetes, surgical control of diabetes and the role played by the bowel in the disease may bring us closer to the cause of diabetes."

Today, most patients with diabetes are not offered a surgical option, and bariatric surgery is recommended only for those with severe obesity (a body mass index, or BMI, of greater than 35kg).

"It has become clear, however, that BMI cut-offs can no longer be used to determine who is an ideal candidate for surgical treatment of diabetes," says Dr. Rubino.

"There is, in fact, growing evidence that diabetes surgery can be effective even for patients who are only slightly obese or just overweight. Clinical trials in this field are therefore a priority as they allow us to compare diabetes surgery to other treatment options in the attempt to understand when the benefits of surgery outweigh its risks. Clinical guidelines for diabetes surgery will certainly be different from those for bariatric surgery, and should not be based only on BMI levels," he notes.

"The lesson we have learned with diabetes surgery is that diabetes is not always a chronic and relentless disease, where the only possible treatment goal is just the control of hyperglycemia and minimization of the risk of complications. Gastrointestinal surgery offers the possibility of complete disease remission. This is a major shift in the way we consider treatment goals for diabetes. It is unprecedented in the history of the disease," adds Dr. Rubino.

Type 2 diabetes, which accounts for 90 to 95 percent of all cases of diabetes, is a growing epidemic that afflicts more than 200 million people worldwide.

At a time when diabetes is growing epidemically worldwide, Dr. Rubino says that finding new treatment strategies is a race against time. "At this point, missing the opportunity that surgery offers is not an option."

In addition to having performed landmark studies in the field of diabetes surgery, Dr. Rubino was the principal organizer of an influential Diabetes Surgery Summit, held in Rome in March 2007. This international consensus conference helped establish the field, making international recommendations for the use of surgery and creating an International Diabetes Surgery Task Force. Dr. Rubino serves as a founding member.

Adapted from materials provided by New York- Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

Jill-O
03-05-2008, 01:44 PM
Very very interesting! Thank you for sharing this report with us!

mzteacher
03-05-2008, 02:38 PM
yes this is really interesting...thanks for posting it...nice to think there is hope out there in the future...
susan

BlueSky
03-05-2008, 02:39 PM
This subject is being hotly debated here in New Zealand. Type2 is a major problem here, especially amongst the Maori and Pacific Islander populations. And there is lots of anecdotal evidence around of bariatric surgery being closely followed by a cessation of insulin resistance. This happens almost immediately, long before any weight is lost. Health resources are being stretched because of burgeoning diabetic kidney disease, eye disease etc. And preempting this with the early use of bariatric surgery is a very compelling option.

mike9876
03-07-2008, 02:32 AM
Who would consider this surgery to be free from diabetes. I would but getting the money together is another matter because I can't see the UK national health service funding very many ops. I would certainly travel to new york for the op. Hopefully in a few years time when they understand more I will gave the funds.

ant hill
03-07-2008, 03:04 AM
Thankyou John for sharing this, This is like the four drugs that can halt the immune hormone that attacks the beta cells that produces insulin.

Fantastic news!! :biggrin: :D

davef
03-07-2008, 04:48 AM
Very interesting article indeed, thanks for posting. Aside from the normal risks with any type of surgery, I wonder if there are any possible long/short term side-effects?

REDLAN
03-07-2008, 05:13 AM
The major issue here is risk - bariatric surgeries are risky procedures. Gastric bypass is more dangerous than triple artery bypass, which is generally done in older and sicker patients. They are not suitable for older patients because of the extremely high mortality rates in this group. Gastric bands are being touted as safer than bypasses - and while they do have much lower mortality rates, the complication rates for bands are worse than gastric bypasses. In particular bands can cause ulceration and erosion of the stomach wall, which can then make it impossible to reverse the procedure.

no one has done a risk-benefit analysis - bearing in mind the high risk of mortality with bariatric surgeries, I suspect that if studies they would find that mortality rates are higher in this group than those who receive conventional treatment for type 2.

there is also this problem...

can cause diabetes remission independently of any weight loss,

while this may be true in rodents, in live clinical settings with real human beings, what they find is that the level of diabetes remission is dependent on....

WEIGHT LOSS & coincidentally how advanced their type 2 diabetes was.

Improvement of Insulin Resistance After Obesity Su...[Obes Surg. 2008] - PubMed Result (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18317853?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)

in comparing gastric bypass and banding they found...

Both gastric banding and gastric bypass are effective for the reverse of IR [insulin resistance] in these patients. It seems that the effect is related to the absolute weight loss rather than different surgical procedures. There is no duodenal jejunal exclusion effect on IR resolution was observed in this study.

the last bit in bold is significant - the study challenges Rubino's hypothesis.

and here's another one

Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therap...[JAMA. 2008] - PubMed Result (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18212316?ordinalpos=10&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)

compared gastric banding to conventional therapy, and they found...

Remission of type 2 diabetes was related to weight loss (R2 = 0.46, P < .001) and lower baseline HbA1c levels (combined R2 = 0.52, P < .001).

and the last bit is interesting - healthier subjects were more likely to go into remission.

here's a study from 1985, demonstrating the possible mechanism for rapid reversal of type 2 diabetes...

PubMed Home (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez)

showing that a VLC (very low calorie) diet reduced FBG within 30 days, with the majority occuring after 10 days. the study found that the drop in FBG was strongly correlated to a decline in hepatic glucose output.

and of course Dr. Rubino's stance has nothing whatsoever to do with his current interests...

Weill Cornell Physicians (http://www.cornellphysicians.com/frrubino/index.html)

He is the proponent of a novel procedure specifically designed to treat type 2 diabetes. Instead of shrinking the stomach like most approaches to weight-loss surgery, his approach reroutes the small intestine, leaving the stomach intact.

for cure Dr. Rubino is thinking surgery, I guess done at his Diabetes Surgery Centre.

What was that I was saying about a risk/benefit analysis?

welcome everyone to the world of medical marketing ;)

REDLAN
03-07-2008, 05:22 AM
the last post didn't work. Here is the correct pubmed link.

Glycemic effects of intensive caloric restriction ...[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985] - PubMed Result (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4044780?ordinalpos=13&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)