Diabetes Forums » Staying Healthy » Monitoring » ? about different meters.


Welcome to Diabetes Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Reply
? about different meters. LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 09:35 AM
Junior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Faber,Va
Posts: 84
? about different meters.

I just recently got all my rocks in the same pile and started testing. I use an accu-chek advantage and also have 2 ascentia contour meters. The contours usually read within a few points of each other but the accu-chek usually reads about 10-12 ponts higher.
I read somewhere that accu-chek is a plasma reading and the ascentia gives a whole blood reading. If this is correct, which reading is closer to the reading I would get from the lab as in A1c?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 09:44 AM
JediSkipdogg's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,353
An A1C is generally measured in Plasma so you would want the accu-check meter for comparing an A1C.
__________________
●Blue Ash, Ohio Police Dispatcher
●Type 1 diabetic for 25 years (11 months old)
●Animas pumper since December of 2002
~IR 1000 (Dec. 2002-Jan. 2005)
~IR 1200 (Jan. 2005 - ?)
●LifeScan OneTouch UltraSmart

Diabetes is an Art, NOT a Science. You must master the control by skills and not by knowledge alone.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 09:50 AM
Junior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Faber,Va
Posts: 84
Thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 09:53 AM
JediSkipdogg's Avatar
Senior Member
I am a: Type 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,353
Meters use to only be able to read whole blood. So an A1C use to be different than a meter. Then they made meters that read both, which was a nightmare if you got it on the wrong setting somehow and didn't realize it. Then they finally started coming out with Plasma only meters, which I think is what most new ones are.
__________________
●Blue Ash, Ohio Police Dispatcher
●Type 1 diabetic for 25 years (11 months old)
●Animas pumper since December of 2002
~IR 1000 (Dec. 2002-Jan. 2005)
~IR 1200 (Jan. 2005 - ?)
●LifeScan OneTouch UltraSmart

Diabetes is an Art, NOT a Science. You must master the control by skills and not by knowledge alone.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 12:26 PM
LI_Beach_Girl's Avatar
Junior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 60
It is my understanding that the Ascencia Contour and the Ascencia Breeze both give plasma readings. I use the Contour at home and the Breeze I leave at work.
__________________
Lynne



If we couldn't laugh we would all go insane
------Jimmy Buffett
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 01:10 PM
Harold's Avatar
Super Moderator
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do Dah, OZ, aka Kansas
Posts: 4,601
Bobby you are trying to compare different types of apples to an orange. Believe the plasma meters will give reading somewhere around 10 to 15 percent higher than whole blood meters. The meters give a quantity of glucose per volume. As in milli grams per deca liter or in millimohs per liter. The HbA1c reading is given as a percentage of glucose that red blood cells are made up of. There are equivalency charts that you can use to equate 90 or 120 day meter averages to an A1c, but that onlyl gets you in the ball park. Individual meter reading do not equate to A1c's.

My own personal experience using my meter reading averages equivlant to A1c runs about 0.3% to 0.5% lower on average compared to an actual A1c.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006, 01:45 PM
Junior Member
I am a: Type 2
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Faber,Va
Posts: 84
Thanks folks.
I guess what I really was trying to figure out was why the contours were 10-12 points lower than the accu-chek but if they both give a plasma reading then I like the contours reading a lot better

Harold.....I'm always trying to compare apples and oranges, never know when you might come up peaches.
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 AM.

For Advertising:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32