Welcome to Diabetes Forums!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|  | 
11-13-2006, 01:32 PM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: North West Ohio
Posts: 21
| | | Meter readings 150 to 210 A1c 6.3 My readings for the last 2 months range from 150 to 210, But my a1c was low
6.3.
My doc says I have had some very low readings in the 40's .
So I have been testing my bs about ten times. Still High.
I washed My hands with hot water boy did the reading go down.
So I ask what up now ?????????????????????????
I need some help now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!  | 
11-13-2006, 01:39 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,696
| | Hi Gizmo, I had that happen. The doctor suggested I test during the night. Turned out I was having some serious lows during the night. I fixed it by having a bedtime snack, sort of. 
__________________ 17 post cards from round 1 3 postcards from round 1/2 And 1 from Ed
I believe the children are our future
Teach them well and let them lead the way
Show them all the beauty they possess inside
Give them a sense of pride to make it easier
Let the children's laughter remind us how we used to be
Whitney Houston Greatest Love of All
| 
11-13-2006, 02:23 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 7,138
| | | Still have that calibrating fluid that comes with your tester? You may want to give it a try. | 
11-13-2006, 03:08 PM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: europe
Posts: 49
| | | I can relate to that The numbers on my meter never correspond to the A1c result. According to the meter I should have a higher A1c. My doctor says that it is probably because I tend to test when I am feeling high, and when I think about it he is right. I only test like half of the time when I am low, because I know for sure that I am low; I dont test often when I am feeling great, because that usually means my levels are normal; but when I am high I test like every 15-30 minutes until I get back to normal. | 
11-13-2006, 05:58 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,846
| | I use alcohol swabs to clean my fingers before testing.  | 
11-13-2006, 06:49 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,816
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg I use alcohol swabs to clean my fingers before testing.  | Your poor fingers must be so dry. There's really no benefit of alcohol over plain old soap and water, plus the alcohol can skew results. | 
11-13-2006, 07:54 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,169
| | My HBA1c is usually pretty close to what the meter average suggests it should be. I don't normally test within 2 hours of eating and miss the post-prandial spikes, which lowers the meter average. But then I dont test while I sleep either (not usually, anyway  ). Because BG is below average at this time, missing these readings increases the average. The last HBA1c was 6.3%, but the meter average of 6.9mmol/l corresponds to an HBA1c of 6.6%. | 
11-14-2006, 05:30 AM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: europe
Posts: 49
| | | I found another potential reason for the diffence between my A1c and my home readings. Last night I compared readings on my usual meter to readings on a meter from another company and there was a huge difference. My usual meter said 151 and the other meter only said 130!
I have thought about it, and I will keep my usual meter. I would rather have a surprisingly low A1c than a surprisingly high A1c. | 
11-14-2006, 05:49 AM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,351
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sviskan My usual meter said 151 and the other meter only said 130! | That's is not unusual, rather it represents close agreement. The meters are just not that accurate. Consider readings within 20% of each other to be the same.
The meters could be made more accurate but that would mean:
1) more blood is needed,
2) the time to get a result would be greater, and
3) the strips would cost even more.
So, as important as accuracy is, the market goes with faster, easier, cheaper. | 
11-14-2006, 05:59 AM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,846
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sviskan I have thought about it, and I will keep my usual meter. I would rather have a surprisingly low A1c than a surprisingly high A1c. |
Are you dosing insulin based on bad meter readings? | 
11-14-2006, 06:41 AM
|  | Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 383
| | There are many valid reasons why A1c does not always compare with glucose meter averages. One very important reason may be in the design of the meter itself. When it comes to home blood glucose meters there is a huge difference between the Precision of the instrument and the Accuracy of the instrument.
The following article explains why Precision is much more important than Accuracy: Quality Control for Blood Glucose Monitoring.
Mark
__________________
Type 1 since 9/1974. On MDI: Lantus in am and pm, Novolin R at meals, Novolog for corrections. Following Dr. Richard Bernstein's program since May 2003.
Web based BG Log (Google Spreadsheets-Requires Google Account to view and to save a copy for use): mg/dl version / mmol version /// Latest A1c (12-14-07)
| 
11-14-2006, 06:47 AM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: europe
Posts: 49
| | I think that it is stupid that some meters in general test higher than others; it is very confusing. Why do companies not calibrate the meters to one and the same result. A 20 point difference is way too much. (Yes, I have compared the meters a couple of times more).
I think it is really important for diabetics to stick to one meter and base insulin dosage on that meter only.
Ok, I need to vent.
I hate the fact that companies, whos only concern is money, have a say in how I feel. Companies work together would you. Please!
I would rather have good strips than cheap strips (of course amount of blood, time and cost should be considered, but not at all costs! (and for me 20 points is a fairly high cost)).
Where I live money for things like strips and medicine is shared trough the whole population, so I dont have to worry about getting the cheapest strip I can find. Here we dont dump even more concerns on those that for some unknown and completely not self conflicted reason got a chronic disease. Every citizen by law pays a certain amount of money each month, sick or not; And no one complains. |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |  | | » Site Navigation | | Diabetesforums.com | | | !-- gallery --> Resource Directory | | | !-- soon --> Contact Zone | | | |