Welcome to Diabetes Forums!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
 | 
03-07-2006, 07:01 AM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, ontario
Posts: 1,747
| | | compact plus???
well i was just givin the new accucheck compact plus....i think im rather impressed with it..pokingmy finger barely hurts. but it uses the same strips as theold accucheck... it kind of looks neat...the only thing these metres lack is the back light. i love this feature of the ultrasmart... i can test in a darker area without needing tons of light
anyone else try the new compact yet?? place your review? |
03-07-2006, 08:50 AM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by psilocybin well i was just givin the new accucheck compact plus....i think im rather impressed with it..pokingmy finger barely hurts. but it uses the same strips as theold accucheck... it kind of looks neat...the only thing these metres lack is the back light. i love this feature of the ultrasmart... i can test in a darker area without needing tons of light
anyone else try the new compact yet?? place your review? | How is it different from the Compact? |
03-07-2006, 10:28 AM
| | Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 292
| | This was asked before on another thread.
I believe that the lancet device is actually part of the meter. Check out this link http://www.accu-chek.ca/ca/rewrite/home/en_CA
__________________ Biking is fun; burn fat, not oil  |
03-07-2006, 12:05 PM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Ritehsedad | The link shows a picture.
There is NO INFORMATION. Thanks, anyway. |
03-07-2006, 12:43 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, ontario
Posts: 1,747
| | | its not that different little bit more quiet. more accurate ,,, and yes the lancet devicce is attached to the meter...but it can be detached.. |
03-07-2006, 01:10 PM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by psilocybin its not that different little bit more quiet. more accurate ,,, and yes the lancet devicce is attached to the meter...but it can be detached.. | Is the display lighted this time? The compact is the only meter I ever use that doesn't have a light. |
03-07-2006, 02:02 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, ontario
Posts: 1,747
| | | its got an alarm, adjustable hypo, gives you averages, you can download results to pc or handheld pc, if theres a defective test strip it will tell you befor you test, its got infrared window for transferring to computer...unfortunately there is no back light which is one draw back for me |
03-07-2006, 03:01 PM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by psilocybin its got an alarm, adjustable hypo, gives you averages, you can download results to pc or handheld pc, if theres a defective test strip it will tell you befor you test, its got infrared window for transferring to computer...unfortunately there is no back light which is one draw back for me | Have you done a bunch of comparison readings to see how it compares to the older Compact? I had some whacky numbers yesterday to the point where I got out 4 meters and checked them over and over again. the compact repeatedly gave me numbers around 180+ while my US was 146-152 and the Flash was even lower. THEN, to top it off I got a 280 when the other meters were reading around 230. sigh. Just when I thought the only discrepancy between the 3 meters was that the Flash reads 8-12 points high in the near hypo range. sometimes it reads identically to the US. I'd chuck every last one of my meters for one that costs over $150 if it's more accurate and consistent. I want one with numbers the size of the Ultra, lighted screen and strip area like the Flash, a compact drum (smaller than the Compact), confirmation beep when it is ready for the blood, results in 5 seconds or less, temperature range 30-120 degrees, etc, etc.  |
03-07-2006, 03:17 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, ontario
Posts: 1,747
| | | i have had the same problem with the original compact..... (mmol)
onetouch ultrasmart- 8.0
compact-11.1
freestyle-8.3
so far i have tested 4 times with the compact plus and ultrasmart- within .4 mmol |
03-07-2006, 03:39 PM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by psilocybin i have had the same problem with the original compact..... (mmol)
onetouch ultrasmart- 8.0
compact-11.1
freestyle-8.3
so far i have tested 4 times with the compact plus and ultrasmart- within .4 mmol |
What numbers were you comparing specifically? I've noticed that some meters track another brand in one range, but not another, consistently. If you give me the mmol I'll convert to mg/dl. |
03-07-2006, 03:49 PM
| | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, ontario
Posts: 1,747
| | | 6.6
8.0
4,7
7.1 |
03-07-2006, 03:55 PM
| | Banned
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by psilocybin 6.6
8.0
4,7
7.1 | 119
144
85
128
ok...that's the range that my meters USUALLY agree with one another, except that the 85 is getting close to value that my US and Flash diverge from one another. At around 70, the Flash more often than not, reads 8-12 higher. Since I take quick action if I see I'm under 60, it is important to me that I get a reading that matches the US.
(I multiply by 18 to get mg/dl--for anyone reading this and not familiar with the conversion factor) |
|
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
|  | | » Site Navigation | | Diabetesforums.com | | | Resource Directory | | | Contact Zone | | | |
<- this is so me
