You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
I am getting the mini med with CGMS in a couple of days. When reading about it it states that every action muct be confirmed with a fingerstick. I was just wondering how off target the CGMS is with the fingerstick. Is it about 5-10 difference or more like 60-70? How reliable is the CGMS?
Thanks
__________________ Bob Loblaw Type 1 since 12/06 32 years old PUMPING SINCE 5/6/8
MINIMed
3/20/08 A1C = 6.6
1/20/08 A1C = 7.3
diagnosis 12/06 = 12.3
Alcohol free since 10/07
Tobacco free since 11/07
There is a very large different in people's experiences... Most of the time, I am very happy with it... I haven't always been, but it has improved greatly lately. My CGMS is usually within 10-15% of fingersticks... but it gets wacky now and again...
__________________ .scott.
.clear paradigm 722 w/ cgms.
.symlin when i remember.
I have found that the numbers are so far off that I actually do more blood sugar testing because I can't trust the cgms. (I always tell my wife - jokingly - that a cgms reading of 102 only means that blood sugar is not 102.) I actually filed a complaint with the FDA because I have had readings that are up to 50% off (100% off, depending on which way you do the math). I kind of wish I had waited to buy a future generation of this product because relying on it has gotten me into trouble too many time.
I have found that the numbers are so far off that I actually do more blood sugar testing because I can't trust the cgms. (I always tell my wife - jokingly - that a cgms reading of 102 only means that blood sugar is not 102.) I actually filed a complaint with the FDA because I have had readings that are up to 50% off (100% off, depending on which way you do the math). I kind of wish I had waited to buy a future generation of this product because relying on it has gotten me into trouble too many time.