Welcome to Diabetes Forums!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|  | | 
07-02-2007, 06:03 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,389
| | | Do they really call it the "honeymoon" phase with type 1.5? I got the impression that honeymoon describes a bonus with type 1, but not having a dead pancreas right away is expected with type 1.5. | 
07-10-2007, 03:14 AM
| | Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: South Africa
Posts: 181
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Funnygrl Do they really call it the "honeymoon" phase with type 1.5? I got the impression that honeymoon describes a bonus with type 1, but not having a dead pancreas right away is expected with type 1.5. | I suspect it means different things to different people - I take it to mean the period between diagnosis as T1/T1.5 and the time that your beta cells no longer produce any insulin at all. In "normal" T1 that could be anything from a few weeks to a few months, for T1.5 anything from a few months to many years.
Just had my first A1c since starting Lantus 4 months ago, was expecting a number around 5.8% based on my testing, but it came out at 6.5%. Starting on apidra now. So here goes with the whole carb-counting thing.... | 
07-20-2007, 12:52 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
| | | dbc,
My endo explained it to me the same way. "Honeymoon" is the time between diagnosis and when the last of your beta cells finally stop working altogether. That is when I will stop using the orals (metformin and actos) and add bolus doses of insulin. Anyone out there get a different explanation?
kimber | 
07-24-2007, 11:41 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
| | | DBC,
Do you really think reaching 150 every day is good? I ask because I have had to really work hard to keep my daily carb intake to a max of 50 to 60 to try to keep my numbers in control. Perhaps I am being unrealistic in trying to get control of my numbers (hoping for 70 to 120 with only a few "oops" times a month going out of bounds) Do all (most?) type 1 diabetics accept 150 or 210 (I see this daily) every day and say ,"I am doing well." ? I have only had the big D for a few months and don't yet know what is do-able and what is unrealistic. Should I just shrug and accept that 150 daily is the best diabetics can do? Am I setting my goals too high? I find that about 4 hours later my numbers do come down, but they go up there every day. Heaven help me if I were to eat more than 60 carbs a day!!!
kimber | 
08-02-2007, 06:07 PM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1
| | | I was diagnosed with LADA about 5 months ago. I am not on any basal insulin but have rapid acting to use with meals. Before I started on Novolog, my BG went up to 160-180 after meals even with a small amount of carbs (anything over about 8g) I do really low carb meals most of the time and never go above 120, even one hour after eating. My understanding of what happens with LADA is that the first phase insulin response if the first thing to go. That's what kicks in for non-diabetics as soon as they start eating and prevents those post prandial spikes. People, even doctors, sometimes say that spiking to 150 is normal after meals but it isn't. I've tested lots of friends and they never go up much above 100. I have read that if you keep your BG in the normal range, and avoid more than a 20-30 point swing, you can keep some beta cell function for a long time. My A1C was 7.2 at diagnosis, now it's 5.6 by avoiding the meal time spikes. | 
10-02-2007, 01:48 AM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Indonesia
Posts: 44
| | | Hi Lethal
Sorry to hear your news, but I read that statistically T1.5 after 3 to 4 years on orals have to move on and take Insulin of one sort or another. I'm one of those after 4 years; Lantus basal and Novelet Bolus. I want to try a one shot of Lantus or maybe a 50/50 split am and pm. I'll ask the question on the board to see if anybody has tried this
Take care
Catcount
Take care
Catcount | 
10-02-2007, 06:48 AM
|  | Junior Member
I am a: Type 2 | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: washington state
Posts: 23
| | | I think the light just came on............ I was diagnosed in 2000 started on oral agents. Did well then per doc went off oral agents, did well for awhile now all of a sudden I have begun having symptoms agis. I bought a meter yesterday and my BG before dinner was 175 after it was 146 at bedtime it was 258. I have an appt with the doc on the 15th but feel crummy and could use a little support. I have really been in denial about this whole thing.............I am a nurse and know what to tell other people but somehow and having a hard time accepting this for myself. | 
10-03-2007, 04:57 AM
|  | Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 405
| | | Well I've tested non-diabetics 30 mins after eating a meal and they've reached 10 mmol/l (180 mg/dl).
I've been honey mooning for 2 years now. Basal has come down in that time from 8 IU to 4 IU. Bolus went from 25 g/IU to 15 g/IU then back to 25 g/IU. It can be frustrating chasing shifts in requirements but it's probably better than having no insulin of your own at all.
__________________
Type 1.5 Diabetic since July 2005
Age 40
On Lantus & Novorapid
Recent A1C: 6.2% MySpace profile | 
10-03-2007, 08:49 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,389
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Well I've tested non-diabetics 30 mins after eating a meal and they've reached 10 mmol/l (180 mg/dl).
I've been honey mooning for 2 years now. Basal has come down in that time from 8 IU to 4 IU. Bolus went from 25 g/IU to 15 g/IU then back to 25 g/IU. It can be frustrating chasing shifts in requirements but it's probably better than having no insulin of your own at all. | I wonder how long they're gonna stay non-diabetic for.
I know many people believe normal people go up to 180, but I just don't buy that. When 200 is diagnostic of diabetes, 180 has to be at least pre-diabetes. | 
01-24-2008, 03:14 PM
| | Junior Member
I am a: Type 1.5 | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: australia
Posts: 10
| | | Thought i would drop a line and tell yars how i'm going.
I've gained weight (about time)weighing in at 91kg.
Dosage is 22units of lantus,9units of nova every meal per day.
hb1c is at 5 which is execellent i think esp for the amount of food i eat and i still eat a bit of junk food to (hehe).
Had a few hypo's lowest being 1.9 and it was terrible for a few hrs.My levels usually run around the low 3's anyway and i feel really good at this level.I can tell when im getting low because i get this real tangy thing in my mouth and when this happens i usually test and i'l be around 3 to 2.5,so i start taking some jellybeans which i love esp the blue and yellow ones.
Anyway time to go now as i'm on nightshift tonight.!!!!!!!! | 
01-24-2008, 03:19 PM
|  | Senior Member
I am a: Type 1 | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick Canada, eh
Posts: 6,033
| | Sounds like the honeymoon finally ended  Y'all come back now, y'hear?
__________________ Michael Pollan on CBC In Defense of Food with Michael Pollan T1 1975, MM 722 pump
A1C 4/08 6.0%
Called John, plus many other things
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
John's Troll Meter - current level: warming | 
04-15-2008, 11:56 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Funnygrl I wonder how long they're gonna stay non-diabetic for.
I know many people believe normal people go up to 180, but I just don't buy that. When 200 is diagnostic of diabetes, 180 has to be at least pre-diabetes. | I agree, I think a lot more people have diabetes then the Dr's are diagnosing. I have tested non-diabetics after meals and they are never above 100. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |  | | » Site Navigation | | Diabetesforums.com | | | !-- gallery --> Resource Directory | | | !-- soon --> Contact Zone | | | |